Control-M workload automation has become an essential platform for our production activity
Overall Satisfaction with Control-M
We use Control-M workload automation to orchestrate business process chain accross French on-premise and Cloud platforms. With Control-M we are able to monitor major part of our critical batches. Our production is optimized and execution planning is shared with all stakeholders.
Pros
- Reprocessing, alerting, scheduling based on calendar
- File transfer
- Multiples connectors using application integrator and plugins
- Self service
Cons
- Administration and upgrade procedure quite complex and time consuming
- Cycling jobs with watch file transfer not easy to schedule properly
- Use case for automation API would bring more adoption and efficiency
- Services are delivered more accurately and faster
- Optimization of financial monthly closing
- Less people to monitor batches
- Support with agility business expansion and transformation
30 - Monitoring team L1 offshore 24/7 (self-service)
Build/run team L2/L3 (heavy client)
IT application owner and project leader (self-service)
Some key users (self-service)
Build/run team L2/L3 (heavy client)
IT application owner and project leader (self-service)
Some key users (self-service)
Do you think Control-M delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Control-M's feature set?
Yes
Did Control-M live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Control-M go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Control-M again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation